Menu
Students evaluate their peers with whom they have collaborated. The final grade is made up of xx% of their intra-group evaluation grade.
💡 Select the model in ChallengeMe to launch this one-click activity!
The main aim is to provide a fair assessment that reflects both the quality of the group work and the individual contribution of each student, thus encouraging active and fair participation by all group members.
Individual responsibility - Each student is encouraged to contribute actively to the group project.
Fairer assessment - The final mark reflects both collective work and individual commitment.
Reduced "free rider" phenomenon - Students are less likely to rely on the work of others.
Developing self-assessment skills - Students learn to objectively assess their own work and that of their peers.
Improved group dynamics - Encourages a more equitable distribution of tasks and better collaboration.
Preparation for the world of work - Simulates teamwork situations with individual performance assessment.
💡 Select the collection of criteria associated with this use case in the platform
Students evaluate the members of their group using the evaluation criteria defined by the teacher.
They can also give feedback.
Students discover the evaluations and feedback they have received, according to the display options they have defined.
The final score is made up of xx% of the intra-group evaluation score.
Choose the evaluation method that suits you best.
You can use a "simple" activity or add additional deposit or evaluation phases.
Why not use our AI assistant to guide students in their feedback. The assistant can give them elements to improve their feedback and make it more constructive.
⬜ Clearly explain the process - Make sure students understand how their final grade will be calculated.
⬜ Train peer assessment - Provide clear criteria and examples to help students assess objectively.
⬜ Use structured valuation tools - Employ standardized headings or forms for intra-group valuation.
⬜ Provide checkpoints - Organize regular checks on project progress and group dynamics.
⬜ Encourage open communication - Create opportunities for groups to discuss their internal workings.
⬜ Moderate extreme ratings - Be alert to particularly high or low scores and investigate if necessary.
⬜ Offer constructive feedback - Provide detailed feedback on group work and individual assessments.
⬜ Adjust the weighting if necessary - Be prepared to modify the percentage allocated to intra-group evaluation according to the results obtained.
ChallengeMe offers clear and precise evaluation criteria that you can customize. What's more, the anonymity of assessments and the possibility of having several assessors per job help ensure fairness.
We also recommend preparing the students, explaining the objectives, and even co-constructing the criterion grid with them, taking examples from previous work.
Absolutely, group work is possible, both in the response phase (submitting a file as a group, for example) and in the evaluation phase (students must agree on feedback and evaluations).
We have a wide range of content available. On the platform, students are guided through the activity with tips for giving relevant feedback. We also provide teachers with documents they can use to present the activity to students.
The choice is yours! You can set up a formative system only (no grades, only feedback), or build a grade with weighting on criteria, bonuses/maluses according to certain events (lateness, for example), or even weight the peer assessment grade with the teacher's grade.
We work with over 90 schools in France, Switzerland, Belgium and Quebec. On our website, you'll find feedback from other schools on our activities.
We invite you to try ChallengeMe free of charge. Please do not hesitate to contact us directly with any questions you may have. Our team will be delighted to help you!
