Menu
This activity impliesimplies that studentsstudents correct QCM made by other studentsstudents. This not only not only to assess the knowledge but also but also to develop their critical analysis skills and understandingunderstanding of thetopics.
💡 Select the model in ChallengeMe to launch this one-click activity!
The main aim is to enhance student learning by actively engaging them in the assessment process, while developing their skills in critical analysis and content revision.
Reinforced learning - Peer correction of MCQs deepens students' understanding of the subject.
Developing critical thinking skills - Students learn to analyze and evaluate the quality of questions and answers.
Improved MCQ writing skills - Students better understand how to formulate effective questions.
Active engagement - This approach encourages more active participation in the learning process.
Diverse feedback - Students receive feedback from their peers, offering a variety of perspectives.
Exam preparation - Exposure to a variety of MCQs helps students better prepare for their own assessments.
💡 Select the collection of criteria associated with this use case in the platform
Students upload their work to the platform according to the teacher's instructions.
Students or teachers assess the work using the assessment criteria defined by the teacher.
They can also give feedback.
Students discover the evaluations and feedback they have received, according to the display options they have defined.
Choose the evaluation method that suits you best.
You can use a "simple" activity or add additional deposit or evaluation phases.
Why not use our AI assistant to guide students in their feedback. The assistant can give them elements to improve their feedback and make it more constructive.
⬜ Provide clear guidelines - Give clear instructions on how to create and assess MCQs.
⬜ Training to create MCQs - Teach students the basic principles for creating effective, relevant questions.
⬜ Encourage justification - Ask students to justify their corrections to deepen their thinking.
⬜ Use a cross-review system - Have each MCQ assessed by several students for greater reliability.
⬜ Integrate self-assessment - Allow MCQ creators to self-assess before peer correction.
⬜ Organize group discussions - Schedule times to discuss difficult or controversial issues.
⬜ Track progress - Use the results to identify areas where students are excelling or struggling.
⬜ Value creativity - Encourage students to create challenging and original questions.
ChallengeMe offers clear and precise evaluation criteria that you can customize. What's more, the anonymity of assessments and the possibility of having several assessors per job help ensure fairness.
We also recommend preparing the students, explaining the objectives, and even co-constructing the criterion grid with them, taking examples from previous work.
Absolutely, group work is possible, both in the response phase (submitting a file as a group, for example) and in the evaluation phase (students must agree on feedback and evaluations).
We have a wide range of content available. On the platform, students are guided through the activity with tips for giving relevant feedback. We also provide teachers with documents they can use to present the activity to students.
The choice is yours! You can set up a formative system only (no grades, only feedback), or build a grade with weighting on criteria, bonuses/maluses according to certain events (lateness, for example), or even weight the peer assessment grade with the teacher's grade.
We work with over 90 schools in France, Switzerland, Belgium and Quebec. On our website, you'll find feedback from other schools on our activities.
We invite you to try ChallengeMe free of charge. Please do not hesitate to contact us directly with any questions you may have. Our team will be delighted to help you!
