Menu
This activity aims to raise students' awareness of plagiarism involving the use of artificial intelligence, and to develop their ability to identify and avoid this type of practice. Students evaluate documents using authenticity criteria to learn how to recognize AI-generated content.
💡 Select the model in ChallengeMe to launch this one-click activity!
The main aim is to develop students' critical thinking about the use of AI in the production of academic content, while training them to produce original, authentic work.
AI plagiarism awareness - Students better understand the ethical issues involved in using AI in academic work.
Developing critical thinking skills - Students learn to analyze and evaluate the authenticity of content.
Improved quality of work - Students are encouraged to produce original, thoughtful work.
Preparation for the professional world - Students develop essential skills in academic and professional integrity.
Enhanced creativity - By avoiding the use of AI, students are encouraged to develop their own ideas.
Better understanding of AI - Students gain in-depth knowledge of AI's capabilities and limitations.
💡 Select the collection of criteria associated with this use case in the platform
Students upload their work to the platform according to the teacher's instructions.
Students or teachers assess the work using the assessment criteria defined by the teacher.
They can also give feedback.
The students use various criteria to indicate whether they found the feedback relevant or not.
They can also provide their markers with a written commentary.
Students discover the evaluations and feedback they have received, according to the display options they have defined.
Choose the evaluation method that suits you best.
You can use a "simple" activity or add additional deposit or evaluation phases.
Why not use our AI assistant to guide students in their feedback. The assistant can give them elements to improve their feedback and make it more constructive.
⬜ Explain the issues - Openly discuss the ethical and academic implications of AI plagiarism.
⬜ Provide examples - Show examples of AI-generated and authentic content to illustrate the differences.
⬜ Teaching detection techniques - Train students to use AI plagiarism detection tools and recognize signs of artificially generated content.
⬜ Encourage critical thinking - Ask students to justify their assessment of a document's authenticity.
⬜ Promote creativity - Emphasize the value of original thought and personal expression in academic work.
⬜ Use hands-on exercises - Provide activities where students have to distinguish AI-generated content from human content.
⬜ Discuss AI's limitations - Explore where AI excels and where it still fails, for a better understanding of its capabilities.
⬜ Establish clear policies - Clearly define and communicate rules regarding the use of AI in academic work.
"It allows them to take a step back from their own work, to go deeper into the concepts of the course and see different methods for solving an exercise. It also gives them a better understanding of what's expected in an assignment and the objectives of the course".
Marie Noémie Thai - ESILV - Mathematics Teacher
ChallengeMe offers clear and precise evaluation criteria that you can customize. What's more, the anonymity of assessments and the possibility of having several assessors per job help ensure fairness.
We also recommend preparing the students, explaining the objectives, and even co-constructing the criterion grid with them, taking examples from previous work.
Absolutely, group work is possible, both in the response phase (submitting a file as a group, for example) and in the evaluation phase (students must agree on feedback and evaluations).
We have a wide range of content available. On the platform, students are guided through the activity with tips for giving relevant feedback. We also provide teachers with documents they can use to present the activity to students.
The choice is yours! You can set up a formative system only (no grades, only feedback), or build a grade with weighting on criteria, bonuses/maluses according to certain events (lateness, for example), or even weight the peer assessment grade with the teacher's grade.
We work with over 90 schools in France, Switzerland, Belgium and Quebec. On our website, you'll find feedback from other schools on our activities.
We invite you to try ChallengeMe free of charge. Please do not hesitate to contact us directly with any questions you may have. Our team will be delighted to help you!
