Menu
Students evaluate the quality of the teaching they receive. The teacher can access the anonymized results and understand what went well or not so well in his or her course.
💡 Select the model in ChallengeMe to launch this one-click activity!
The main objective is to gather constructive feedback from students on the quality of teaching in order to continually improve courses and teaching methods.
Continuous course improvement - Feedback from students enables teachers to adjust and improve their teaching methods.
Student engagement - Students feel listened to and involved in their own learning.
Identifying strengths and weaknesses - Teachers can clearly identify what works well and what needs improvement.
Adaptation to students' needs - Teachers can better understand students' expectations and difficulties.
Transparency and communication - This practice encourages open dialogue between teachers and students.
Valuing teaching - The evaluation demonstrates the importance attached to the quality of teaching within the institution.
💡 Select the collection of criteria associated with this use case in the platform
Students or teachers assess the work using the assessment criteria defined by the teacher.
They can also give feedback.
Students discover the evaluations and feedback they have received, according to the display options they have defined.
Choose the evaluation method that suits you best.
You can use a "simple" activity or add additional deposit or evaluation phases.
Why not use our AI assistant to guide students in their feedback. The assistant can give them elements to improve their feedback and make it more constructive.
⬜ Guarantee anonymity - Make sure the assessment system preserves student anonymity to encourage honest feedback.
⬜ Choose the right time - Carry out the assessment at a time when students have sufficient experience of the course, but before the exam period.
⬜ Explain the importance - Clearly communicate to students the importance of their feedback for course improvement.
⬜ Use a variety of questions - Include both closed (rating scales) and open-ended questions to get detailed feedback.
⬜ Act on results - Show students how their feedback has been taken into account to improve the course.
⬜ Encourage self-reflection - Use the results to reflect on your own teaching practices and professional development.
⬜ Contextualize results - Consider external factors that may influence evaluations (class size, course level, etc.).
⬜ S hare good practice - Use positive feedback to identify and share good teaching practice within the institution.
ChallengeMe offers clear and precise evaluation criteria that you can customize. What's more, the anonymity of assessments and the possibility of having several assessors per job help ensure fairness.
We also recommend preparing the students, explaining the objectives, and even co-constructing the criterion grid with them, taking examples from previous work.
Absolutely, group work is possible, both in the response phase (submitting a file as a group, for example) and in the evaluation phase (students must agree on feedback and evaluations).
We have a wide range of content available. On the platform, students are guided through the activity with tips for giving relevant feedback. We also provide teachers with documents they can use to present the activity to students.
The choice is yours! You can set up a formative system only (no grades, only feedback), or build a grade with weighting on criteria, bonuses/maluses according to certain events (lateness, for example), or even weight the peer assessment grade with the teacher's grade.
We work with over 90 schools in France, Switzerland, Belgium and Quebec. On our website, you'll find feedback from other schools on our activities.
We invite you to try ChallengeMe free of charge. Please do not hesitate to contact us directly with any questions you may have. Our team will be delighted to help you!
