Evaluate and provide personalized feedback to large cohorts

This activity enables students to receive different personalized feedback on their productions rather than a standard correction, even if the cohorts are large. The assessment can be used to generate a grade if students are mature enough.

💡 Select the model in ChallengeMe to launch this one-click activity!

🎯Objectives of the activity

The main objective is to provide individualized, constructive feedback to each student, even in large classes, to improve their learning and progress.

👍Benefits

  • Personalized learning - Each student receives feedback tailored to his or her work, enabling a better understanding of strengths and weaknesses.

  • Improved quality of work - Detailed feedback enables students to pinpoint areas for improvement in their work.

  • Increased student commitment - The prospect of personalized feedback motivates students to become more involved in their work.

  • Developing autonomy - Students learn to assess themselves by comparing their work with the assessment criteria provided.

  • Efficient time management for teachers - The use of structured assessment tools makes it possible to efficiently manage the assessment of large cohorts.

  • Individual progress monitoring - Teachers can track each student's progress over time with personalized feedback.

📝Example of criteria

💡 Select the collection of criteria associated with this use case in the platform

⚙️How does it work?

Submission of work

Submission of work

Students upload their work to the platform according to the teacher's instructions.

This step can be carried out individually or in a group

Evaluation and feedback

Students or teachers assess the work using the assessment criteria defined by the teacher. 

They can also give feedback.

This step can be carried out individually or in a group

The teacher can also take part in this stage

Results display

Students discover the evaluations and feedback they have received, according to the display options they have defined.

Results can be hidden if required, if the teacher does not want students to have access to them.

Use the different valuation methods

Choose the evaluation method that suits you best.

Add extra phases

You can use a "simple" activity or add additional deposit or evaluation phases.

Enrich the experience with our AI assistant

Why not use our AI assistant to guide students in their feedback. The assistant can give them elements to improve their feedback and make it more constructive.

💡Some advice

  • Define clear evaluation criteria - Establish detailed evaluation rubrics to ensure consistency in the feedback provided.

  • Use appropriate technological tools - Choose a platform that facilitates the management of evaluations and the distribution of feedback for large cohorts.

  • Encourage self-assessment - Ask students to assess themselves before receiving feedback, to develop their critical analysis skills.

  • Vary the sources of feedback - Combine peer assessment, self-assessment and teacher assessment to offer a variety of perspectives.

  • Monitor the impact of feedback - Analyze how students integrate the feedback they receive into their subsequent work, to adjust your approach if necessary.


This approach provides personalized, constructive feedback to each student, even in large classes, encouraging their progress and engagement in the learning process.

Marie Noémie Thai

"It allows them to take a step back from their own work, to go deeper into the concepts of the course and see different methods for solving an exercise. It also gives them a better understanding of what's expected in an assignment and the objectives of the course".

Marie Noémie Thai - ESILV - Mathematics Teacher

Answers to your questions

How can I be sure that the assessments are fair and objective?

ChallengeMe offers clear and precise evaluation criteria that you can customize. What's more, the anonymity of assessments and the possibility of having several assessors per job help ensure fairness.

We also recommend preparing the students, explaining the objectives, and even co-constructing the criterion grid with them, taking examples from previous work.

Absolutely, group work is possible, both in the response phase (submitting a file as a group, for example) and in the evaluation phase (students must agree on feedback and evaluations).

We have a wide range of content available. On the platform, students are guided through the activity with tips for giving relevant feedback. We also provide teachers with documents they can use to present the activity to students.

The choice is yours! You can set up a formative system only (no grades, only feedback), or build a grade with weighting on criteria, bonuses/maluses according to certain events (lateness, for example), or even weight the peer assessment grade with the teacher's grade.

We work with over 90 schools in France, Switzerland, Belgium and Quebec. On our website, you'll find feedback from other schools on our activities.

Resources to support you

Read the testimonials

Try ChallengeMe free of charge

We invite you to try ChallengeMe free of charge. Please do not hesitate to contact us directly with any questions you may have. Our team will be delighted to help you!