Improve critical thinking about information sources and AI

This activity aims to develop students' ability to critically evaluate information sources and AI-generated content. Students evaluate documents using criteria of authenticity and reliability, to strengthen their critical thinking skills in the face of information proliferation and the increasing use of AI.

💡 Select the model in ChallengeMe to launch this one-click activity!

Activity objective

The main aim is to develop students' essential skills in evaluating information, verifying sources and critically analyzing content, whether produced by humans or AI.

👩‍💻Bénéfices

Developing critical thinking skills - Students learn to analyze information objectively and in depth.

Improved research skills - Students become more adept at identifying reliable and relevant sources.

Bias awareness - Students learn to recognize and avoid bias in information.

Preparation for the digital world - Students are better equipped to navigate the age of misinformation and AI.

Strengthening independent thinking - Students develop the ability to form their own opinions based on critical analysis.

Improved digital literacy skills - Students become more proficient in using and evaluating information technologies.

📝Example of criteria

💡 Select the collection of criteria associated with this use case in the platform

⚙️How does it work?

Submission of work

Submission of work

Students upload their work to the platform according to the teacher's instructions.

This step can be carried out individually or in a group

Evaluation and feedback

Students or teachers assess the work using the assessment criteria defined by the teacher. 

They can also give feedback.

This step can be carried out individually or in a group

The teacher can also take part in this stage

Evaluation and feedback of group members

Students evaluate the members of their group using the evaluation criteria defined by the teacher. 

They can also give feedback.

This phase also includes a self-assessment

Evaluating feedback

The students use various criteria to indicate whether they found the feedback relevant or not.

They can also provide their markers with a written commentary.

Results display

Students discover the evaluations and feedback they have received, according to the display options they have defined.

Results can be hidden if required, if the teacher does not want students to have access to them.

Use the different valuation methods

Choose the evaluation method that suits you best.

Add extra phases

You can use a "simple" activity or add additional deposit or evaluation phases.

Enrich the experience with our AI assistant

Why not use our AI assistant to guide students in their feedback. The assistant can give them elements to improve their feedback and make it more constructive.

💡Some advice

Provide a variety of examples - Present a range of information sources, including examples of misinformation and AI-generated content.

Teaching verification techniques - Train students in fact-checking and source verification methods.

Encourage debate - Hold discussions on controversial topics to stimulate critical analysis.

Use case studies - Present real cases of misinformation or misuse of AI to illustrate the importance of critical thinking.

Promote metacognitive thinking - Encourage students to reflect on their own thinking and decision-making processes.

Incorporate practical exercises - Offer activities where students have to evaluate and compare different sources of information.

Collaborate with experts - Invite media professionals or AI specialists to share their expertise.

⬜ Track skill development - Set up a system to assess students' progress in their critical analysis skills over time.

Answers to your questions

How can I be sure that the assessments are fair and objective?

ChallengeMe offers clear and precise evaluation criteria that you can customize. What's more, the anonymity of assessments and the possibility of having several assessors per job help ensure fairness.

We also recommend preparing the students, explaining the objectives, and even co-constructing the criterion grid with them, taking examples from previous work.

Absolutely, group work is possible, both in the response phase (submitting a file as a group, for example) and in the evaluation phase (students must agree on feedback and evaluations).

We have a wide range of content available. On the platform, students are guided through the activity with tips for giving relevant feedback. We also provide teachers with documents they can use to present the activity to students.

The choice is yours! You can set up a formative system only (no grades, only feedback), or build a grade with weighting on criteria, bonuses/maluses according to certain events (lateness, for example), or even weight the peer assessment grade with the teacher's grade.

We work with over 90 schools in France, Switzerland, Belgium and Quebec. On our website, you'll find feedback from other schools on our activities.

Resources to support you

Read the testimonials

Try ChallengeMe free of charge

We invite you to try ChallengeMe free of charge. Please do not hesitate to contact us directly with any questions you may have. Our team will be delighted to help you!